Showing posts with label Talaris. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Talaris. Show all posts

Monday, January 23, 2023

Middle School Boys Vandalized Talaris

 The Laurelhurst Blog received this information:

At about 4:30 pm on Tuesday January 10, four middle school-aged boys were crouched down on the NE 41st side of the Talaris property, then they ran away up the hill. 
A short time later the Talaris groundskeeper came looking for them and reported that they had been vandalizing the Talaris buildings – breaking lights among other things. 
One boy had light brown/blond hair and a pale complexion (with pink cheeks from running) and he wore a powder blue t-shirt. One of the other boys wore a yellow t-shirt and had brown hair.
All four ran up NE 41st, then down the 43rd NE boulevard, then left onto West Laurelhurst Drive NE, then they turned left onto 45th Avenue NE. 
I assume they live somewhere in that part of Laurelhurst, but every time they saw me they ran for it, so I don’t know where they ended up. If you know who they are, it would be good to talk to them or their parents before they get into big trouble. I understand the police have been alerted.

Tuesday, November 15, 2022

Update On Eagles At Talaris

Here is a recent post from the Union Bay Watch Blog published by Larry Hubbell, long-time local photographer and birder.



Talaris - Eagles


The Talaris property at 4000 N.E 41st Street, Seattle, WA has been the nest site for a pair of Bald Eagles for more than a decade. I have taken to calling them Talia and Russ because these names, when said in that order, sound similar to Talaris. 

The following sign, facing NE 41st St, informs those who pass by that the property is soon to be subdivided and developed.

The next photo shows the representation of the plan as displayed on the sign. It clearly says the plan may vary. However, nothing I have come across, so far, indicates major changes to the plan. (Note: This is a quick post due to time constraints as mentioned below.)

The Bald Eagle's nest is located in the southwest portion of the property - approximately halfway between the houses numbered 31 and 30. (Specifically, the nest is in the clump of Cottonwood trees immediately above the final "n" in the word "Representation" in the artwork.)

This photo is from the June 16th, 2022, Preliminary Arborist Report. 

On page two of the report it states 226 trees to be removed, i.e. 52% of the 436 trees on the property. (The removal of so many trees is counter to our citizen's best interest and desires. Click Here for proof) 

The red circles, in the photo above, indicate failing or dead trees and the blue circles indicate trees in poor condition. The location of houses (in the prior artwork) to the poor quality trees does not appear to be coincidental. 

Although, as you will see a poor quality tree, from a human perspective, may actually be a very high quality tree from nature's point of view. Today, I am focusing on the Cottonwoods in the lower left, that surround the Bald Eagle nest.

Cottonwood branches are easy to break even when the tree is alive. In fact, all but one of the many dozens of branches I have seen Bald Eagles collect for their nests have been cottonwood branches. 

Generally, the eagles focus on breaking off smaller live branches near the tops of the trees. I do not believe it is simply an issue of easy access as I have seen Bald Eagles breaking off cottonwood branches quite some distance from their nests. I believe their primary motivation is the ease with with the branches break.

Similarly, the majority of Western Washington Bald Eagle nests I have seen have been built in cottonwood trees. The trees tend to branch out near the top third of the trunk creating ideal nest sites. However, this also contributes to the trees more top heavy than many other tall local trees.

It is also important to note that, Populus trees (which include Cottonwoods) are one of the top four genera of trees that support caterpillars in our area. (Click Here to read more about their value.) This makes cottonwoods a keystone species. In other words, the caterpillars that the trees support may be the most important early food source, for the majority of all birds that nest and raise young in the city. 

Update: 

After writing this post I remembered hearing about how bees utilize cottonwoods trees. A search led me to this interesting website which mentions benefits for bees and humans


Nature is amazing!



Finally, dead cottonwood trees are highly attractive as potential nest sites. If a woodpecker, like a Northern Flicker makes its nest in a Cottonwood snag the next year many different creatures may reuse the nest (although not at the same time). Squirrels and Wood Ducks are great examples. I have even seen a Pileated Woodpecker open up an old Northern Flicker nest, in a Cottonwood, to create a place to sleep during cold weather.

I agree, that Cottonwoods are not great trees to have near your house. From what I have seen around Foster Inland if a cottonwood tree dies, especially if it is girdled by a beaver, the whole tree is likely to fall within a few years. The logs along the far shore are most probably dead cottonwoods.

With all this in mind my suggestion would be to situation new housing in the Talaris property almost any where but the southwest corner - where the Cottonwood grove and the Bald Eagle nest are located. This would be better for the Bald Eagles, Northern Flickers, many secondary nesting creatures, and via supporting caterpillars, virtually all nesting birds in the area. (This last piece of logic would also put a premium on saving the trees in the genus Quercus, Prunus & Betula as they are also extremely supportive for caterpillars.) Plus, this would be the safest approach for the future residents of the property, not to mention being highly beneficial in terms of access to nature. The current approach seems to be unaware or unconcerned with these possibilities. 

In the publicly accessible information on the project, that I found, it barely mentions saving a few of the Cottonwoods. Plus, it seems mostly concerned with the risk associated with disturbing the Bald Eagles. 

It assumes the nesting Bald Eagles are habituated to the noise of traffic on NE 41st St. and so unlikely to take issue with activities beyond 120 feet. Specifically, the Ecology Report, dated August, 9th, 2018, in Appendix C - "Management Recommendations for Bald Eagle Nest" states, 

"In conclusion, the subject Bald Eagle nest is unlikely to be impacted by project activities outside a 120-foot distance buffer as long as the landscape buffer (trees) within this area and the on-site wetland is maintained. However, to satisfy the City of Seattle and shield the applicant, obtaining an Eagle Incident Take permit is highly recommended. No other mitigation, site development alternatives, or ongoing management practices should be necessary." 

In fact, the permit mentioned implies that if the nesting Bald Eagles are disturbed no one has to be concerned or take responsibility. In my opinion, this is not a logical approach. Living in harmony with nature is a responsibility we must all share whether we are developers, neighbors or more remote citizens of Seattle.

As a citizen of Seattle, I believe my (and our) only option left is to state our preferences. The online link where we can file public comments regarding this project will only accept input until: 

Monday, June 13, 2022

Talaris Proposal Presentation Tonight At LCC Annual Meeting

Tonight at 6:30pm, the Laurelhurst Community Club (LCC) is holding its Annual meeting via Zoom (Meeting ID: 89158249695),

The agenda items include:
  • Administration
  • Summary of 2022 events
  • Treasurer's Report
  • Election of Trustees
  • Highlights from Councilmember Pedersen - presented by Malik Davis 
  • Talaris Redevelopment Project Team - presentation of proposal

LCC sent out this information:
The Talaris/Battelle site’s existing seven buildings and entire landscape have been a designated Seattle landmark since November 6, 2013. Over these past years, various development projects have been proposed for the campus. 
The most recent plans submitted to the City include: 48 homesites added to the landscape; the re-use of five of the seven existing buildings; demolition of two landmarked buildings; and doubling the size of the existing conference center building.  
LCC has been at the negotiating table with the owners, the owners' development representative, the architects (Bassetti), and the landscape architects (Site Workshop) to support the preservation of the site and existing tree canopy, while forming an appropriate development plan for the owner.


For more information about LCC go here.

Wednesday, October 13, 2021

Talaris Development Update



The Laurelhurst Blog has received numerous email asking about the status of the Talaris redevelopment.

The Laurehurst Community Club (LCC) recently told the Laurelhurst Blog that Talaris, managed by Pistol Creek is still in the SDCI permitting process, which has been going on for over a year now, as well as the Historic Landmark Preservation approval process. 

LCC added "Nothing has changed from last year as of yet, except for the recent big clean up which was long overdue." Very tall weeds covered one of the roads making undrivable. Recently the main road used for years to enter the property has been closed and the secondary one that was covered in weeds is open during the day.

The large grassy area on Mary Gates Drive was also finally mowed.

LCC said they have not heard anything specific from the owners, except they received approval for removing about 11 dead trees that fell over in mid August, 2021.


LCC's published this information in their September newsletter:

The 18 acre Talaris campus  has been unoccupied since October of 2019 when Quadrant Homes unexpectedly  pulled out of an contingent deal with site's owner to buy and develop the property.

For the past two years the site has not had any active use and the landscaping has been neglected with fallen trees, and  with  grass overgrown to a fire hazard level. In addition, an additional cyclone style temporary "security " fence was installed in violation of the historic landscape requirements. 

On August 11th, LCC noted the arrival of numerous chipper trucks on the site, and contacted the owner for information. The response was that the site was undergoing a big clean up as a good faith gesture to the neighborhood, and in preparation for potential lease/sale opportunities.  The dead trees were removed, the interior of the site was cleaned out, the perimeter along NE 41st Street was mowed, and the pond that had dried out was cleared out, and scraped down to the pond's clay bottom. The intent in future plans is to re-fill with water this fall after it was cleaned of debris. 

The temporary galvanized fence was finally removed on August 18th, leaving the black one that was installed on  September 12, 2013, the day before the site and buildings were designated by the City as historic landmarks. 

LCC continues to meet with the site's owners about potential development plans, as well as participate in the public comment processes of the City's land use and its historic preservation board.


LCC's July/August LCC newsletter said:

Talaris Update

On June 16, the owner of the landmarked Talaris site requested approval from the Seattle Landmark Preservation Board for a 12- or six-month extension on their current permit for development. The Board approved only six months, with several members expressing concern about the current conditions on the site and the need for more frequent updates. The owner also is pressing the Board to approve more temporary fencing, which is not part of the original site design. 

In September 2020, the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspection (SDCI) determined that the owner’s proposed plans warranted an EIS (Environmental Impact Statement), requiring the study of the potential impacts from implementation of various development alternatives. Historic preservation, retention of exceptional trees, water, waste, and traffic impacts are examples of impacts that must be evaluated before any permit is issued. The EIS is in process.

 

The property was designated with landmark status in November 2013, which dictates that specific controls define certain features of the landmark to be preserved and a Certificate of Approval process is needed for changes to those features. Some incentives and controls included in the City's ruling are zoning variances, building code exceptions, and financial incentives, which are protected, as stated on the City's Landmark and Designation website.

The site, built in 1967, was originally owned by Battelle Memorial Institute. In 1997 Era Care Communities purchased the property for $6,125,000 and it was developed into Talaris Institute which focused on infant and early learning research of the brain. In 2000, Bruce Mc Caw under the name 4000 Property LLC of Bellevue, purchased the property for $15,630,000. The county has assessed the property at $14 million and sold in 2000 for $15.6 million.

The property, when sold several decades ago, included an underlying Settlement Agreement in which Battelle Neighbors and the Laurelhurst Community Club (LCC) are partnered together with the land owners of the parcel. The Settlement Agreement specifically states that major institutions can't operate within this property (no hospitals, colleges, etc). And the Settlement Agreement has specific restrictions attached which specifies the use of the property to protect the quality of life in the adjacent neighborhood.

For decades, neighbors were free to stroll the grounds, until 2013, when Talaris suddenly put up "No Trespassing" signs and installed a four feet chain link fencing in 2013, as well putting up a main driveway barricadefence on northwest side and a surveillance camera

Neighbors were no longer allowed to use the large grassy meadow area where generations of kids practiced soccer and the past few years the grounds facing NE 41st Street are often neglected and grass not consistently mowed. 

The Laurelhurst Community Club, has been involved with the site for over 30 years, working to ensure the property is well integrated with the neighborhood by closely monitoring proposed development. LCC has also worked with current owners in lobbying for better property maintenance

The Laurelhurst Blog posted about the owners of Talaris violating the landmarks agreement with the City, by installing a chain link fence last month at the 7.8 acre Talaris campus (4000 NE 41st Street).  
Shortly after, the Landmarks Preservation Board listed on their meeting agenda for Talaris: "proposed perimeter fencing- retroactive."

In 2018, Talaris removed a large oak tree with proper approval from the Landmarks Preservation Board and asked for retroactive Certificate of Approval from the City, violating the Landmarks agreement.

And in April 2016, Talaris again cut down trees without proper approval from the City Landmarks Board and after the trees were cut down, then requested a retroactive Certificate of Approval from the City.

And again, in November 2013, Talaris also cut down another tree with approval from the Landmarks Board and then suddenly got a retroactive certificate in place after the trees were cut down.  

In February of this year, neighbors reported a homeless man living on the property. The site manager, living on the property had to use pepper spray to provide some distance between himself and the male,  It was reported that the male left when Seattle Police asked him to leave or be under arrest. Neighbors have reported he is still on the property from time to time leaving traces of needles.  

Affordable Talaris, made up of individuals, want to turn the large property into affordable housing, which would require an upzone of the Talaris property.. Their most recent update says: "We have expanded the scope of our efforts to advocate for a new urban village in the area around the Talaris parcel in the next Comprehensive Plan update."

It has been reported that the group has never reached out to the Laurelhurst Community Club, though they put LCC on their documents, which was not authorized.  It is also reported that they won't  respond to LCC.

Neighbors believe that is not a good fit for the property.  One neighbor commented that it's private property, not City, so can't be deemed as affordable and it's also not near to Transit usually where affordable housing is usually located.  And the massive development at Blakely is all have affordable housing that was required. 

It has been reported that several groups have come forward interested in buying the property. However, nothing has moved forward.  Several are Jeff Granville, with a non-profit called Mindful Presents , who expressed interest in developing the site as wellness center.   Another group, Harmony Hill, that work with cancer survival patients were interested. 

The once beautiful campus is now covered in overgrown weeds, enormous blackberry bushes, trees fallen across once were roads around the campus, most of the buildings in disrepair, the beautiful pond is filled with brown water and the grass on the entire campus is overgrown and very tall.  

In August the Business Journal published this information:

Quadrant's plan for Battelle/Talaris campus heads into city SEPA review



Rendering by Bassenian Lagoni 

The basic plan is for 65 houses on the 18-acre campus in Laurelhurst. Two of the original nine landmarked buildings would be removed.

 

A nearby neighbor said:

This is a precious piece of land and to destroy it due to greed would be a travesty. It is said that the owners deserve a return on their money but not at the expense of a natural resource which is irreplaceable.  And they maybe should have done due diligence BEFORE buying.

Details on the proposed land use action, EIS scoping, and public meeting can be found in this notice issued by SDCI.  

Friday, February 26, 2021

December Crime Activity Report And Transient Possibly Living At Talaris

Below is the neighborhood December crime activity report.


The Neighborhood Private Security Patrol activity report was not provided by the Laurelhurst Community Club.

SPD has reported that car thefts went up by about 5% in December, of which several reportedly may have to do with street lights being out, keys left in cars or cars left unlocked.

Neighbors have also reported a homeless young man reportedly living on the grounds of Talaris. One neighbor reported the male was in the vicinity of what was formerly the soccer practice field and also could be living in one of the empty buildings. It was reported that drug paraphernalia was also found. SPD was called about one incident and it was reported that the male then left.


Seattle Police Department Reports:


12/1 2:24am 4100 block of 43rd Avenue NE
DISTURBANCE


12/5 4:25pm 4100 block of 43rd Avenue NE
SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES


12/7 2am 4500 block of 52nd Avenue NE
LARCENY


12/8 4:35pm 4100 block of 42nd Avenue NE
CAR THEFT


12/9 12:49pm 4100 block of 43rd Avenue NE
DISTURBANCE


12/11 10:19pm 4400 block of NE 41st Street
CAR THEFT


12/13 2pm 4300 block of NE 44th Street
THEFT FROM CAR


12/14 5:07am 4300 block of NE 44th Street
CAR THEFT


12/14 5:49am 4300 block of NE 44th Street
PROWLER


12/14 8:57am 5400 block of 47th Avenue NE
BURGLARY


12/15 9:51pm 4400 block of 55th Avenue NE
CAR THEFT


12/19 7:26am 4400 block of 38th Avenue NE
BURGLARY


12/19 9:08am 4400 block of 38th Avenue NE
BURGLARY


12/19 2:51pm 4400 block of 55th Avenue NE
CAR THEFT


12/20 4:11pm 4400 block of 55th Avenue NE
FRAUD CALL


12/22 11:30pm 4100 block of 43rd Avenue NE
SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES


12/24 1:18am 4500 block of NE 41st Street
SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES


12/24 2:40am 4200 block of 51st Avenue NE
PROPERTY THEFT


12/25 5:44pm 4100 block of 43rd Avenue NE
SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES


12/29 12:44am 3600 block of 42nd Avenue NE
DISTURBANCE


Tuesday, February 2, 2021

Fox Sighting In Laurelhurst



The Laurelhurst Blog received this information:

On January, 15th around 11am, we saw a red fox cross the road. It was coming out of the Union Bay area and crossed the road to the former Talaris conference property. It seemed too small to be a coyote and it had a white tip on it's tail. One other person also saw it and also believed it was a fox.
A neighbor would also like to share this website in which viewers can see the various types of animals spotted in different neighborhoods.

Laurelhurst currently shows one coyote sighting this year on January 24 at 11:38am.


Monday, December 14, 2020

Today Laurelhurst (LCC) Trustee Meeting

 

Tonight at 6:30pm, the Laurelhurst Community Club (LCC) is holding its monthly Board meeting, open to all neighbors, via Zoom.


Here is the agenda:

6:30  Welcome and Administration
  • Calls/Concerns from neighbors
  • Treasurer's Report
  • November minutes
  • LEAP update
  • Treasurer's Report

6:50  Committee Reports
  • Dues/Maiing dues/format
  • Passenger only service Lake Washington and Union Bay
  • Crime/Security Patrol/SPD updatesCommunity outreach-sock drive, historic article/ welcome letter
  • Community outreach-sock drive/crime wrap up
  • Welcome letter final draft
  • Issues at the Laurelhurst Playfield
  • Hospital Phase 3 update
  • Talaris update
  • Tree issues Seattle governance
  • City Hall update/issues

8:00 Adjourn

Friday, October 9, 2020

Monday Laurelhurst (LCC) Trustee Meeting





Monday night at 6:30pm, the Laurelhurst Community Club (LCC) is holding its monthly Board meeting, open to all neighbors, via Zoom.

Here is the agenda:

6:30  Welcome and Administration
  • Calls/Concerns from neighbors
  • Treasurer's Report
  • September minutes
  • Announcements
  • Treasurer's Report

6:50  Committee Reports
  • Communication Director/ Newsletter Editor /new creatives
  • Crime Prevention/SPD Liaison / Subscriber Mailing timing
  • Community outreach-sock drive, historic article/ welcome letter
  • Parks Department
  • Land Use Updates: Children's Hospital and Talaris

7:45 Executive Session

Tuesday, September 15, 2020

Comment Now On Talaris Re-Development












The deadline for public comment for the Talaris Redevelopment Scoping /EIS is on Thursday at 4:45pm. 

Send your comments to prc@seattle.gov and include project #3030811-LU and your address in the comment letter for future notices.

LCC recently published this information:
Talaris Redevelopment Scoping /EIS Up Next 
In March 2020, permit application #3030811-LU was posted for public comment ,and many of you and other interested members of the public submitted over 70 comment letters to the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspection (SDCI). 
As part of examining the appropriateness and viability of this proposal, the SDCI has issued a Determination of Significance. This requires a SEPA review – an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). 
The applicant is required to prepare a thorough analysis of three options:
  1. Leave property as is. No development.
  2. The proposed plan with the 67 parcels: 62 single-family homes, seven tracts, two historic buildings demolished, altering the landscape, restoring the wetland, and changing the use of several buildings.
  3. A third plan that includes at least one meaningful preservation option that retains the seven buildings and much of the landscape, which would have significantly fewer adverse impacts on the site
Scoping determines what will be included in the EIS. Examples might include:
  • the preservation impacts on the buildings and landscaping
  • transportation impacts (how many more trips will be generated) and lack of Metro transit, the nearby intersection capacities
  • the soils and critical slope regarding potential slides and erosion,
  • construction impact, including habitat disturbances and displacement, tree canopy reduction
  • nearby public school capacity,
  • changing uses that may not be compatible with surrounding homes. 

Note that this site has underlying zoning of single-family homes on a  5,000 foot lot or use as an Institute for Advance Studies (as it is today).

In May, LCC published this information in their newsletter:
:
Talaris Redevelopment Still in Play 
The Talaris property is once again under review of the Seattle Department of Constructions & Inspections (SDCI) under project #3030811-LU. This proposal is for 67 new single-family homes and seven separate land tracts; however, now the applicant is the Pistol Creek group from Bellevue, not Quadrant Homes. 
Many neighbors sent in comments about the project, which has not yet been approved by the Seattle Landmark Preservation Board (SLPB) nor SDCI. LCC and its consultants have expressed concern to the City about the process of submitting a project for Master Use Plan permitting approval without the prior approval of the Seattle Landmark Preservation Board. SDCI reviews cover many aspects to determine impacts on zoning, transportation, wetlands, drainage, steep slope erosion, biological/wildlife, cultural resources, landmark status, and more. Major projects with such proposed drastic site changes trigger a SEPA (State Environmental Protection Act) review and, most often, an EIS (Environmental Impact Study). These tools systematically identify the impacts and require alternatives and mitigation options to be included as prescribed by local, state and federal regulations. 
LCC and other entities have expressed concerns to the City about the recent process being “out of order,” arguing that SLPB should have vetted the plans before they were submitted to the SDCI, Notable historic preservation organizations, including LCC’s preservation consultant, delineated the conflict the proposed intense development had with the Department of Interiors’ National Standards for Historic Preservation, which the City of Seattle has adopted. It would be a more efficient use of City resources to have the plans approved or altered by SLPB and then proceed through the complex SDCI permitting process.  
SLPB has not yet set a date to evaluate Pistol Creek’s plans. In the meantime, SDCI is allowing the developer to push the plans along in their system under the pretense of its SLPB approval. This could just be an attempt to establish a false valuation for the owner for a project that may never achieve approval. 
LCC, the Seattle Audubon, and many tree advocate professionals also submitted comments objecting to the proposed drastic plans to remove 271 of the 455 healthy trees on the site in order to construct 67 new home sites. Of most concern the plan removes 289 trees that are “exceptional” or part of an exceptional grove. According to the developer’s arborist report, only 79 of the exceptional trees would be retained (27 percent). Unlike rebuilding a demolished structure, mature and exceptional trees take 40+ years to replace their functions, including cleansing pollutants from the air, preventing soil erosion, and providing appropriate habitat for urban wildlife. 
The severe tree removal would also cause an increase in land temperatures due to lack of shading as recently evidenced in Seward Park. The City of Seattle has stated its explicit goal to increase its tree canopy to 30 percent. Allowing such massive tree removal on a landmarked landscape is cannot be mitigated and would change the ecosystem of the entire neighborhood, as well as undermine the City’s tree canopy and Climate Change goals. Since the project is not approved yet by the City, there is a always a possibility of an alternative site plan that would be compatible with the landmark preservation national standards. 
The owner is entitled to a reasonable return on investment, and any plan will have to meet that criteria as well. LCC continues to work cooperatively on any viable option, from any entity. Please contact us (with your millions) to discuss a connection to the owner.

LCC told the Laurelhurst Blog that Bruce McCaw's company, Pistol Creek, managed by Greg Vik, the President, is using the original Quadrant team of consultants to move the project forward.

LCC added:

The Pistol Creek people are not developers who build these suburban type home subdivisions. Thus, it would appear that Pistol Creek, is going through the City of Seattle's SDCI process to achieve approval for its plans. If that would occur, then it likely  (not certain)  it would be re-sold to another home builder/development operator. 
It is not known if, and who,  that entity would be, but the entitlement approvals from the City of Seattle would allow the property to be flipped again. 
The important issue is that moving these plans through the SDCI system without FIRST being approved by the Seattle Landmark Preservation Board, is "out of order". and creating a false economic value for something that may never be able to be compatible with its landmark status.  It is utilizing taxpayers' scarce resources at SDCI on something that may never be approved. The City would be more efficient to require and receive the SLPB approval, then submit an acceptable plan to SDCI for any approval and issuing a MUP (Master Use Plan).

A neighbor recently contacted the Landmarks Preservation Board about how the  landmarked buildings can be demolished, saying "I thought that’s why there are landmarked so that they are preserved. I understand the change of use on 5 of them but how can they be demolished? Please explain. This does not seem proper. "

The Land Use Planning Supervisor responded to the neighbor saying:
Yes, there is landmark protection on the site. The applicant has applied for a Certificate of Approval from the Landmarks Board (administered by the Department of Neighborhoods - DON) to demolish some of the structures as part of their bigger project.  Evidently, the Certificate of Approval can be approved for demolition in certain circumstances but DON would need to provide any further information about that.  
SDCI is reviewing the development proposal and is generally not allowed to issue a demolition permit for a landmarked structure unless the Certificate of Approval is granted.  This is a complex project with many regulatory issues for the applicant to resolve.  
As part of the review by SDCI, we ask for comments about anticipated impacts of the proposal.  You can also comment on whether the proposal meets the criteria of approval for the decisions that need to be made by SDCI.  If an appeal of an SDCI decision is received, the final decision, along with the decision on the actual full subdivision, will be made by the City Hearing Examiner.  Quite a bit of review still needs to be completed prior to any decisions being made.
The property was designated with landmark status in November 2013, which dictates that specific controls define certain features of the landmark to be preserved and a Certificate of Approval process is needed for changes to those features. Some incentives and controls included in the City's ruling are zoning variances, building code exceptions, and financial incentives, which are protected, as stated on the City's Landmark and Designation website.

The site, built in 1967, was originally owned by Battelle Memorial Institute. In 1997 Era Care Communities purchased the property for $6,125,000 and it was developed into Talaris Institute which focused on infant and early learning research of the brain. In 2000, Bruce Mc Caw under the name 4000 Property LLC of Bellevue, purchased the property for $15,630,000. The county has assessed the property at $14 million and sold in 2000 for $15.6 million.

The property, when sold several decades ago, included an underlying Settlement Agreement in which Battelle Neighbors and the Laurelhurst Community Club (LCC) are partnered together with the land owners of the parcel. The Settlement Agreement specifically states that major institutions can't operate within this property (no hospitals, colleges, etc). And the Settlement Agreement has specific restrictions attached which specifies the use of the property to protect the quality of life in the adjacent neighborhood.

For decades, neighbors were free to stroll the grounds, until 2013, when Talaris suddenly put up "No Trespassing" signs and installed a four feet chain link fencing in 2013, as well putting up a main driveway barricadefence on northwest side and a surveillance camera

Neighbors were no longer allowed to use the large grassy meadow area where generations of kids practiced soccer and the past few years the grounds facing NE 41st Street are often neglected and grass not consistently mowed. 

The Laurelhurst Community Club, has been involved with the site for over 30 years, working to ensure the property is well integrated with the neighborhood by closely monitoring proposed development. LCC has also worked with current owners in lobbying for better property maintenance

The Laurelhurst Blog has posted about the owners of Talaris violating the landmarks agreement with the City, by installing a chain link fence last month at the 7.8 acre Talaris campus (4000 NE 41st Street).

Shortly after, the Landmarks Preservation Board listed on their meeting agenda for Talaris: "proposed perimeter fencing- retroactive."

The Laurelhurst Blog contacted the Landmarks Preservation coordinator about this agenda item and they said:

The owner’s representative attended the meeting on December 13. They were asked by Board members to look at a more comprehensive security plan for the campus, in addition to, or in lieu of the new 6’ fence. 
To be responsive to this request, the owner requested to table the item, so it was not considered by the Landmarks Board at their meeting on December 18th. 
When work is done without approval we assess the situation and attempt to remedy the issue. In this case, we’ve asked the applicant to seek approval, so they have started that process.  
The code does not address numbers of retroactive applications.  I cannot speculate on the property owner’s motivations.  
We are enforcing the code by requiring the property owner to acquire a Certificate of Approval from the Landmarks Board.  Had the owner not started the application process they would have received a Notice of Violation from Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections.

Neighbors are wondering why there needs to be two fences. One neighbor said "Talaris acts like neighbors are criminals and had to install two fences around the property in addition to the already existing fence. We have never seen such a thing." 

On September 2nd, Talaris attended the Landmarks Preservation Board meeting and the agenda item said: "Proposed perimeter fencing; retroactive" with these Application materials/presentation package.

In 2018, Talaris removed a large oak tree with proper approval from the Landmarks Preservation Board and asked for retroactive Certificate of Approval from the City, violating the Landmarks agreement.

And in April 2016, Talaris again cut down trees without proper approval from the City Landmarks Board and after the trees were cut down, then requested a retroactive Certificate of Approval from the City.

And again, in November 2013, Talaris also cut down another tree with approval from the Landmarks Board and then suddenly got a retroactive certificate in place after the trees were cut down.  

The once beautiful campus is now covered in overgrown weeds, enormous blackberry bushes, trees fallen across once were roads around the campus, most of the buildings in disrepair, the beautiful pond is filled with brown water and the grass on the entire campus is overgrown and very tall.  


Recently, Historic Seattle published this information on their website:


Opportunity for Public Engagement for Landmarked Battelle/Talaris Site


Over the years, we've shared news and updates on plans for the Battelle/Talaris property in Laurelhurst. This 18-acre modernist Seattle Landmark comprises of a significant designed landscape (Rich Haag & Associates) and multiple buildings (NBBJ Architects) that were originally built for Battelle Research. In more recent times, Talaris Conference Center operated from the campus. The buildings and site have been vacant since late 2019. Historic Seattle worked closely with the Friends of Battelle/Talaris to successfully nominate the property as a Landmark back in 2013. The Laurelhurst Community Club has been instrumental in advocating for the property's protection for decades. Various redevelopment plans have been proposed to the Landmarks Preservation Board, but none have moved forward. Historic Seattle has been communicating with ownership to discuss a pro-preservation alternative for the property.
A current land use application for the property has triggered the environmental review process. In response to the application, the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections (SDCI) has issued a SEPA (State Environmental Policy Act) Determination of Significance for the proposed project and is seeking comments on the scope of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). This is an opportunity for the public to comment on what the EIS should cover. SDCI has identified historic preservation as an important area of significant adverse impact. We agree.
The proposal calls for the subdivision of the site into "67 parcels and 7 tracts of land, construction of 62 houses and change of use of five existing landmark structures to 3 single family residences, 29,000 sq. ft. of office and 3,200 sq. ft. of restaurant on a landmarked site (Battelle Research/Talaris Conference Center). Project includes demolition of 2 structures and a shed, alteration of landscape features, and restoration of a wetland all on a landmarked site."
Historic Seattle will be submitting comments and encourages you to do so as well. The message to convey to SDCI is that the buildings, landscape, and entire site are significant. The proposed land use action will destroy much of the landscape and two buildings. The EIS must include at least one meaningful preservation alternative or option that would have significantly less adverse impact on the site. Historic Seattle is inquiring whether this deadline can be extended.
  
Details on the proposed land use action, EIS scoping, and public meeting may be found in this notice issued by SDCI.